We are very pleased that so many people took the time out of their busy schedules to view our blog. An even bigger thanks to those who took the time to contribute their thoughts. We'd like to share with you an excerpt from an e-mail we received from a Mr. Eugene Grubb (Ret. USMC):
"I served in Vietnam and I have heard horrific stories of torture in Vietnam from my fellow veterans. I saw the artwork by the gentleman on your website and tears came to my eyes. I love America and support the government but the torture of these men at Abu Ghraib was unacceptable. No innocent man should be humiliated and subjected to torture. But I do believe that torture for the safety of your country is necessary. If a terrorist knows where his master's are keeping the American troops hostage, or if he knows where a bomb is I believe that it is a good idea to torture the information out of him to keep our country safe."
This quote sheds light on a very interesting moral predicament that most people find themselves in. We believe it is wrong to torture other innocent human beings, but a part of us feels that in some instances, mainly when we believe an individual is guilty, it is necessary for the greater good.
The question is, where do we draw the line? When can torture be considered necessary, if at all? President Obama has stated that the United States does not torture, and therefore plans on closing Guantanamo Bay. Is this a wise move?
Tell us what you think by posting a comment, or e-mailing at mmovements@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Cool blog!
I think it was. Even though that man knows way more more than I do, I don't think torturing is the way to go. There are probably other ways tot get infofmation.
Cool blog!
I disagree with using torture in any situation and therefore agree with Obama in this case.
Anyway, great blog and thanks for reading mine! =)
Post a Comment